I began this blog-piece in response to an apologist piece on the ABC's religious news page which claimed that the scale of the Catholic
Church's paedophilia scandal led to the inevitable conclusion that it was
suffering from 'institutional atheism'. That churchmen 'were behaving as if God
did not exist'.
While this is clearly an insult to atheists everywhere, it's
also a complete misunderstanding of the dynamics at play here. The Church is
not just any organisation. Its purpose and premise demand that we look deeper
and consider the Church on its own ground. We have to ask, what exactly is it
at the core of the Church's evil, and in the light of the global revelations of decades of violent abuse, it can only be evil, says about that edifice?
The unspoken issue so far in the Church's response to the
exposure of entrenched and systemic paedophilia, and the endless revelations of
decades of physical and emotional abuse of those in its care, is the spiritual
cost. The damage to souls that are the Church's ultimate pastoral
responsibility. Allow me to explain.
The fundamental spiritual significance of the death and
resurrection of Christ has three main elements:
# 1. The end of the Blood Rite as the primary spiritual
technology.
# 2. The cultural shift to the Mediated Rite - the symbolic sacrifice of the Mass.
# 3. The triumph of the human soul over the death of the body.
Christ's incarnate soul becoming 'excarnate' at his death on the cross, and incarnate again before the opening of the tomb around 36 hours later (proving the immortality of the soul, and it's primacy over the body as the
'essential self' of the human experience).
It's the first of these that's spiritually significant in
terms of paedophilia and the systematic abuse of the weak and victimised within
the Church.
The Blood Rite was the original form of guaranteed
connection with the 'next world' and the world of the Gods. In essence it works
like this. When a ritual death is enacted, when the Winter King, or the Chosen
One is formally and ritually murdered the Soul leaves the body and makes its
way to the next world.
Originally this meant a human sacrifice, later an animal victim.
Originally this meant a human sacrifice, later an animal victim.
When this ritual slaughter happens, a hole, a gateway, is
opened between that world and this, and the skilled magical practitioner (a.k.a
priest) can put his hand through that opening, bringing things from that
world to this, or sending messages from this world to that.
This can mean bringing divine knowledge, wisdom or truth
from the Gods to earth, which is the basis for all ancient religion's use of
augury, reading the future from the entrails of a sacrificed animal. Or it can
mean sending prayers, spells, or requests for assistance to the Gods in a way
they cannot ignore.
Either way, ripping a soul from a body is a powerful
magical tool; the ultimate mechanism for powerful magic. The awful shock to the
soul of a bloody and painful death to a conscious victim causes a trauma that
can't be beat for ripping open a connection with the spirit world.
OK, I hear you say, that's weird, and possibly nauseating,
but so what? What has it got to do with abuse in the Church? Let me explain.
The Blood Rite still works. When Christ invented the
symbolic sacrifice of the Mass, and went on to sacrifice himself as a final act
of atonement for the whole human race it became unnecessary to kill anything to
connect with the Gods. But it didn't in any way eradicate or de-power the Blood
Rite as an effective magical tool. It may be old technology, but it still
works.
In the New World thousands were slaughtered in Mayan blood
rituals as recently as the 15th century. In the Western Magical Tradition variations
on the blood rite are still a guarantee of at least partial success (if you
know what you're doing). And it still follows the principle that the more conscious
the creature that you kill the more powerful and effective the spell. Human
sacrifice will still be more effective than animal sacrifice as a human being
is more conscious of the painful progress and ultimate end of ritual murder
than an animal.*
But human sacrifice is messy, and of course illegal. And
there's always the problem of what to do with the body. But there is an
alternative. A way of causing a trauma to the soul that can open up that rift,
that can allow the skilled and unprincipled magical practitioner to re-use the
same victim again and again. And that's the ritual abuse of an innocent.
If you ritually rape a child you cause the kind of psychic
and spiritual damage that can achieve the same magical effect as a ritual
murder. Only, generally speaking, the life force in a child is powerful enough
to keep the child alive and more or less functioning afterward. The same energy
that gives children the ability to heal rapidly when injured can help the child
'recover' mentally, with memory growing a scab over the wound and burying the
damage deep within. It may mean the child becomes more peculiar or eccentric.
It probably means that they will become prey to depression, despair and mental
illness as they grow older, if they survive that long. It certainly means that
they will be only too vulnerable to the predatory behaviour of other
paedophiles, rapists and opportunist bastards that our society has in abundance.
And yes, this is what's known as Black Magic.
This is what Black Magic looks like.
Some magical practitioners will tell you that there's no black or white
magic, it's just a spiritual technology. Which is true enough ~ for a given
value of 'truth' at least: Magic doesn't kill people, people kill people. But it's this
'no good, no bad, just energy' Manichean view that gets a lot of magical neophytes/cult
fodder into trouble in the first place. Spiritual subjection in a cult causes
the same type of damage to the soul, if more slowly and rarely to the same
extent. In a cult it's usually a parasitic rather than predatory form of spiritual
abuse, based on domination and slow spiritual degradation. But the spiritual
mechanics, the metaphysics, are the same.
And it's this same principle that's the spiritual elephant
in the room in the abuse of children by priests. The damage they do isn't just
physical and psychological, it's spiritual. Clerical child abuse is profoundly
spiritually destructive. And it has never been raised in any discussion or
analysis of the problem or the Church's response to it that I've come across.
Do the priests involved understand this spiritual issue? Do
their bishops? Is it a conscious part of what they do to children? Is their
predatory behaviour spiritually sharpened? Are they consciously performing a twisted form
of sacrifice when they abuse children? These are, after all, men for whom the
spiritual is their raison d'ĂȘtre. Can they really do what they do in ignorance
of its darker spiritual aspects? And does the Church hierarchy understand the
implications?
From my own experience I know of one case in particular that
may illuminate. A child who had been a victim of the kind of 'black magic' ritual
abuse I describe above spoke about it in confession. That priest took advantage
of that information. Among the vile things he did was to rape the child in an
empty Church while reciting the Lord's Prayer. With particularly heavy emphasis
on the 'forgive us our trespasses' part. So there was at least an awareness of
the risk to his own soul, if no concern for the child's soul, which was presumably
already the plaything of the Devil.
In the late 1990s the Vatican sent a Cardinal around the
world to collect testimony from victims of clerical child abuse. This victim
described in detail what had occurred. I find it almost impossible to believe
that the spiritual implications weren't fully understood by a Prince of the
Church. So the Church knows, or should know.
Yet not a word is ever said. No
compassion ever evident. No openness about what such spiritual corruption, such
outright heresy has done to the Church,
if not just to its victims. Only a closing of ranks around men who have
perverted not just the social standing of the Church but seriously compromised
its spiritual core. If the Church stands for anything it stands on the purity
of its spiritual connection to the Godhead. Without it there is nothing but a
shabby collection of men with a liking for power, baubles and dressing up.
And on the basis of the evidence, the endless global
outpouring of cruelties, predatory abuse, and deliberate and callous brutalising of the innocent, this
monstrous spiritual cess-pit is not, cannot possibly be the workings of a
compassionate loving God.
And if not God, then whom?
'Institutional atheism' is a ludicrous conceit.
I'm sure we can find a more precise definition.
.o0o.
.
* To intensify the shock and trauma involved the black
magician Aleister Crowley recommended torturing the chosen animal to increase its
fear and suffering before the final killing.
2 comments:
I struggle to acknowledge anything spiritual about these abominable actions. It is simply temporal lust and power. The cover-up is the rainbow connection of power and fear - again both temporal. Let's not dignify scuttling filth with spiritual dimensions.
I think it may have been George Orwell who said that human beings are more than caable enough of all the appallings they do without the help of a spiritual beng. Which is entirely true. Human beings are capable of almost anything. But that in itself dons't peclude the spiritual elemnt. And it would be a mistake to think that the spiritual elment is the CAUSE of human evil. It's far more likely that a spiritual parasite feeds off hman evil.
Post a Comment